Methodology for Fact-Checking Claims
MultiFact Check (MFC) collects and verifies information from a wide range of credible sources. It focuses strictly on verifiable factual claims and does not evaluate personal opinions or viewpoints. Each fact-check undergoes a structured editorial process. The editorial team determines the verification approach, while fact-checkers consult original sources, review publicly available data, and use a variety of digital verification tools to ensure accuracy and reliability.
Source Attribution
MFC clearly attributes all sources and references used to support its findings and conclusions. Proper citation ensures transparency and traceability of information. In rare cases where revealing a source’s identity could compromise their safety, MFC protects their anonymity in accordance with ethical journalism practices.
Objectivity and Fairness
MFC strives to maintain balance, impartiality, and factual accuracy in all its reports. Every fact-check is guided by fairness and evidence, ensuring that the final assessments are based on verifiable data rather than opinions or assumptions.
Principle of “Do No Harm”
MFC’s ethical standards prioritize minimizing harm in all its work. This includes avoiding personal attacks, refraining from defamatory or ad hominem statements, and respecting both copyright and privacy laws.
Transparency and Non-Partisanship
MFC maintains complete transparency regarding its funding sources, partnerships, and operations. The organization ensures that no financial or institutional relationship influences its editorial decisions. MFC is firmly committed to independence, accountability, and non-partisanship in all aspects of its work.
Rating System
Each verified claim is assigned a rating that reflects its factual accuracy. We use five main rating categories. A claim is rated as “True” if it is accurate and supported by verified evidence; “False” if it is incorrect and contradicted by credible evidence; “Partly False” if it is a mix of true and false key claims, where the false claims do not predominate; “Misleading” if it contains elements of truth but lacks critical context or presents facts in a deceptive manner; or “Unproven” if insufficient evidence exists to verify or disprove the claim.
Corrections Policy
MFC is committed to prompt, transparent, and accountable corrections. When an error is identified, it is corrected openly, with a clear explanation of what was changed and why. Readers are encouraged to report potential errors, share feedback, or submit complaints to info@multifactcheck.org.